Sunday, November 08, 2009

Horcoff - Penner - Hemsky


There has been much conversation over the past year regarding this line. Derek Zona has shown, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that when they played together at even strength last season they got terrific results to go along with terrific underlying numbers.

So if you had any of these three guys in your hockey pool, you were justified in screaming at your telelvision whenever MacTavish broke up the line, which was most of the time. That's been established, I think.

The question is, how much were the other lines hurt by having most of the forward talent on one line? More specifically, we want to know the effect on the team as a whole.

To do this I wrote a script to go through the NHL.com time on ice sheets and find the games that Penner played most of his EV icetime with Horcoff and Hemsky. If that happened, the game's EV tied-score data was dumped into bin #1. If that didn't happen, and both Hemsky and Horcoff played in the game ... then the game's EV tied-score data was dumped into bin #2.

THE OILER TEAM RESULT:
In the games with Penner-Horcoff-Hemsky as the top unit:
48.5% of the EV tied-score shots were owned by the Oilers.
48.9% of the EV scoring chances were owned by the Oilers.

In other games (83 and 10 both on the game roster):
48.0% of the EV tied-score shots were owned by the Oilers.
47.7% of the EV scoring chances were owned by the Oilers.

So MacTavish's decision to keep Penner off the top unit, probably due in part due to his personal distaste for Dustin, seems to have had a small detrimental effect on the play of the team as a whole. Not a hell of a lot, but more than I was expecting. And, going by some of the commentary that I have read on the subject, considerably less than a lot of Oiler fans were expecting I'm sure.

With the top line loaded up or not, this was just a slightly below average skating team at even strength last year. Shuffling players around the lineup in different ways only accomplishes so much.

UPDATE: I've added scoring chances as well and, following RiversQ's comment, it appears that we should expect shift in scoring chance percentage of greater than 1.1% (the amount that happened) about 6 times in 10 by chance alone. So the the impact on the team of playing Horcoff-Penner-Hemsky as a line is so small, in terms of scoring chances, that we can't see it through the noise. It may have even had a neagtive effect on the team's chances of winning.

4 Comments:

Blogger RiversQ said...

Vic, I'm just guessing but that looks a heck of a lot like no difference. Care to take a crack at the error involved here? I'd be shocked if it's less than 1% and it would have to be much less than 1% for it to be meaningful.

If you just take your two datasets and look at the distributions, how wide are they? How many games in bin #2 were greater than 48%? How may games in bin#1 were less than 48.5%?

11/08/2009 11:13 am  
Blogger Vic Ferrari said...

RiversQ:

I was thinking the same thing, then I decided to look at scoring chances as well ... since we have them, and they are the bast stat available to us, why not?

I've updated the post above and it's about the same as with EV tied shots. i.e. a whisker better. So that's probably a reasonable guess.

11/08/2009 11:26 am  
Blogger Vic Ferrari said...

Back again. A quick trial of selecting the scoring chance data from 27 random games and comparing them to the remaining 39 games ... 100 trials and 59 yielded a larger difference in save% than .011.

Eeps, no sensible person could reject the RiversQ hypothesis (that being: it didn't make a fiddler's damn of difference to the team's overall performance whether Horpensky played together or not). Maybe I'll run a larger sample later, but p~=0.6 looks to be the case now.

11/08/2009 11:59 am  
Blogger Matt Loede said...

Casting top sports bloggers and fans for an on-line web cam sports debate show ( http://www.fanvsfan.com ) .

The show is styled after the ESPN show "Pardon The Interruption" or "Around The Horn" but bloggers and fans debate sports. It also has a traveling show like "College Game Day" and a blog aggregator / vertical ad network which will assist and drive traffic to your blog and earn you more money .

Talk trash against rival fans / bloggers and win prizes and also drive traffic back to your blog. Top fans and bloggers compete in FanBowls / Featured debates and can win the use of the Ultimate Tailgate Machine (UTM) a 41-foot tricked out bus to take to a game to tailgate. On the UTM is a reality series like ESPN College Game Day, but instead of professional analyst broadcasting your blog will broadcast live from the game with the FanVsFan crew. Other Contestants/bloggers/fans who don't win the UTM can win other prizes such as memorabilia from Steiner Sports ( www.steinersports.com ).

See the press release here http://www.marketwatch.com/story/versus-technology-llc-announces-the-launch-of-fan-vs-fan-2009-09-09

The FanVsFan project is represented by a top Hollywood talent agency - William Morris Endeavor http://wma.com (see below) . Contact Matt Loede at 216.225.4598 or via email at mloede@fanvsfan.com with your name, blog and contact info.

We are only accepting the top 250 bloggers to be considered "In The Network". We are searching / casting for blogs who have promise as individual brands and who are interested in broadcasting and promotional opportunities.

Step 1 register at FanVsFan http://fanvsfan.com/register

Step 2 apply to be "In The Network" http://fanvsfan.com/in_the_network

Step 3 contact Matt Loede Mobile: 216.225.4598 or via email at mloede@fanvsfan.com .

You don't have to be in the network to participate, but being in the FanVsFan Network has many benefits.
1. Drive more traffic to your blog
2. We will push advertisements to your blog which will assist you and monetize your efforts
3. We represent your blog to brands, entertainment community and
assist with marketing and promotional support from industry veterans while your blog remains independent.

Learn more about how to get in the network here http://fanvsfan.com/in_the_network .
Get In The Game. Sign your blog up and compete, broadcast win!
Best,

Matt Loede
FanVsFan
Mobile (216) 225-4598

William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, at a glance

June 1, 2009

William Morris Endeavor Entertainment Combined revenue: $350 million to $400 million*

Actors: Russell Crowe, Denzel Washington, Adam Sandler, Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Robert Pattinson, Amy Adams, Keira Knightley, Sacha Baron Cohen, Tyler Perry
Directors: Martin Scorsese, Michael Bay, Ridley Scott, Tim Burton, Quentin Tarantino, J.J. Abrams

Music: Eagles, Kanye West, Pearl Jam, Taylor Swift, Britney Spears, Brooks & Dunn, Rascal Flatts, The Killers, Amy Winehouse, Pussycat Dolls, Mary J. Blige, Alicia Keys, Eminem, 50 Cent

Corporate: American Express, Revlon, Hasbro, MySpace, General Motors, Coke Zero

Athletes: Magic Johnson, Arod etc

Leagues / Teams : NFL , NHL , Dodgers

11/10/2009 5:27 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home